Hello Reader,

AI agent frameworks have created a crowded and confusing landscape. This edition offers a direct, value-focused comparison of these popular frameworks, examining their features, ease of use, enterprise readiness, and ideal use cases to help you decide which is best suited for your project.

This edition of the newsletter is written by Adam Bluhm, Principal AI Engineer at HiddenLayer, and a former award-winning Senior Solutions Architect at AWS. Adam Bluhm builds and architects secure mission-ready GenAI applications for the U.S. national security community. He lives in the Greater St. Louis area, raising a family and is a former VMware Staff Architect and USAF veteran. Follow Adam on his YouTube, and LinkedIn. Off to you, Adam...

Hi, Adam here 👋! In almost all my customer conversations this topic comes up - which AI Agent is suitable for their workloads. With options like AWS Strands Agents, LangChain, LangGraph, Microsoft’s AutoGen and Semantic Kernel, and Crew.AI, selecting the right tool is critical. Let's get started..

1. AWS Strands-Agents - Minimal-Code, AWS-Powered Agents

Released in May 2024, AWS Strands Agents is an open-source SDK designed for simplicity and speed. It employs a “model-driven” approach where developers define an agent’s goal via a prompt and provide a list of tools. The framework, powered by the underlying LLM’s reasoning capabilities, autonomously handles the planning and execution of tool calls.

Key Features: Strands ships with over 20 pre-built tools for common tasks like getting the current time (current_time), calling AWS services (use_aws), and making web requests (http_request), significantly accelerating proof-of-concept development. It is model-agnostic but features tight integration with the AWS ecosystem and supports emerging standards like Anthropic’s Model Context Protocol (MCP) for dynamic tool discovery.

Pros: Its primary advantage is ease of use, allowing developers to build functional agents with minimal Python code. Its open-source nature and flexibility to use non-AWS models are also significant benefits.

Cons: Strands is not a fully managed service; users are responsible for hosting, scaling, and monitoring the agent code on their own infrastructure (e.g., EC2, Lambda). As a newer framework, it has a smaller community (~3.2k GitHub stars) compared to more established alternatives.

Ideal Use Case: Rapidly prototyping agents that perform cloud tasks or call APIs, especially within the AWS ecosystem. It is an excellent choice for building proofs-of-concept and demos with a minimal learning curve.

2. LangChain - The Popular Swiss Army Knife for LLM Applications

LangChain is one of the most widely recognized libraries for building LLM-powered applications. It is a comprehensive framework that provides components for prompts, memory, vector stores, and, most notably, tool-using agents based on reasoning strategies like ReAct.

Strengths: LangChain’s main draw is its vast ecosystem of over 600 integrations, making it easy to connect an agent to nearly any data source or tool. Its massive community (100k+ GitHub stars) ensures extensive documentation, tutorials, and support. High-level APIs simplify initial development, making it a popular choice for hackathons and initial prototypes.

Weaknesses: The framework’s many layers of abstraction can make complex agents difficult to debug and may introduce performance overhead. Originally designed for prototyping, its default agent implementations can lack the robustness required for production environments, a limitation that led to the development of LangGraph.

Ideal Use Case: Prototyping LLM applications that require connecting multiple components, such as a RAG pipeline with tool-use capabilities and conversational memory. It serves as an excellent starting point for many projects, though complex applications may eventually require more specialized tooling.

3. LangGraph - Structured and Stateful Orchestration for Production

Introduced by the LangChain team, LangGraph provides a stateful orchestration framework for designing agents as controllable graphs. It replaces the simple, autonomous loop of a basic agent with a structured workflow of nodes and edges, offering greater control, reliability, and observability for complex tasks.

Strengths: LangGraph is built for production. It offers durable execution, persistent memory, human-in-the-loop checkpoints, and rich debugging via LangSmith. Its graph-based architecture is flexible, allowing developers to implement various patterns like sequential tool use, reflection cycles, or multi-agent collaboration with explicit control flow.

Learning Curve: LangGraph has a steeper learning curve than LangChain, as it requires developers to design the agent’s structure upfront. However, its control and reliability are significant payoffs for production-grade systems.

Ideal Use Case: Enterprise developers building complex, reliable, and observable AI workflows. It is the logical next step for projects prototyped in LangChain that need to be hardened for production, particularly those involving long-running tasks, multi-agent systems, or steps requiring human oversight.

4. Microsoft AutoGen - Multi-Agent Conversations and Collaboration

AutoGen is an open-source framework from Microsoft Research designed to facilitate collaboration between multiple LLM agents. It structures agent interaction as a conversation, where specialized agents can chat with each other and with human users to solve complex problems.

Key Idea: Instead of a single agent, you define multiple agents with distinct roles (e.g., Planner, Solver, CodeExecutor). AutoGen orchestrates their dialogue, allowing one agent to delegate tasks to another. This conversational paradigm simplifies the implementation of sophisticated multi-agent patterns.

Features: AutoGen supports an agent orchestration loop where agents can invoke each other as tools. The companion AutoGen Studio provides a no-code interface for experimenting with agent workflows. It also aligns with emerging interoperability standards like the Agent2Agent (A2A) protocol.

Ideal Use Case: Applications that naturally map to a team of collaborating AI personas. For example, building a troubleshooting assistant where one agent queries a knowledge base while another executes tasks is a perfect fit for AutoGen’s conversational, multi-agent model.

5. Microsoft Semantic Kernel Enterprise-Oriented SDK with Plugins and Planning

Semantic Kernel (SK) is Microsoft’s open-source SDK for integrating AI into conventional enterprise applications. It functions as an orchestration framework that combines LLMs with plugins (tools) and planners, with a strong focus on stability, security, and multi-language support (C#, Python, Java).

Key Concepts: In SK, a central “kernel” loads plugins, which are collections of functions that can be native code, REST APIs, or other prompts. A “planner” then composes a sequence of plugin calls to fulfill a user’s request. This provides developers with fine-grained control over execution.

Enterprise Features: Built for enterprise scenarios, SK emphasizes governance and reliability. It supports planning within constraints to enforce business rules and integrates seamlessly with existing software stacks, particularly in .NET environments. It has also embraced interoperability standards like MCP and A2A.

Ideal Use Case: Tightly integrating AI agents into existing enterprise applications, especially in Microsoft-centric environments. It is best for building stable, maintainable, and secure “copilots” where determinism and compliance are paramount.

6. Crew.AI Collaborative Intelligence with Multi-Agent “Crews”

CrewAI is a Python framework focused on orchestrating teams of role-playing autonomous agents that work together as a “crew.” It provides a lean and intuitive structure for defining agents with specific roles, assigning them tasks, and managing their collaborative workflow.

Concept of Crews: Developers define Agents (with roles, goals, and backstories) and Tasks (with descriptions and expected outputs) separately. A Crew is then assembled to execute these tasks in a specified process (e.g., sequential). This separation of concerns makes the system modular and easy to understand.

Ease of Use: CrewAI is praised for its intuitive abstractions, which map closely to real-world team dynamics. Its opinionated design accelerates development by handling the underlying orchestration, allowing developers to focus on defining the roles and workflow.

Enterprise Push: CrewAI is actively developing enterprise-grade features, including a control plane for monitoring, logging, and on-premise deployment, positioning itself as a serious contender for production workflows.

Ideal Use Case: Workflow automation that can be broken down into a series of steps performed by specialized “expert” agents. Content generation pipelines (researcher, writer, editor) or IT automation (monitor, analyst, resolver) are excellent fits for CrewAI’s collaborative, role-based model.

Side-by-Side Comparison

Final Recommendations

Fastest Proof-of-Concept: AWS Strands Agents is the top choice for speed, thanks to its minimal-code approach and pre-built tools. Crew.AI is a strong runner-up for multi-agent ideas. However, the fact that AWS Strands-Agents is exploding in popularity with over a million downloads, is super easy to get advanced agent patterns up and running, and that it’s opensource and platform agnostic earns my top choice for this catagory.

Best for Production: LangGraph stands out for its mature, controllable, and observable architecture designed for enterprise-grade reliability. Microsoft Semantic Kernel is an equally strong choice, especially for integrating AI securely into existing C#/.NET applications. I predict AWS-Strands-Agents will be best for production very soon as it continue to improve. I just hope Strands can add native support for observability tools like LangFuse as well.

Best Overall: The LangChain + LangGraph ecosystem offers the best all-around balance today. LangChain provides the accessibility and vast integrations for initial development, while LangGraph supplies the structure and reliability needed to scale to production. Its massive community ensures unparalleled support, resources, and talent availability. However, if you want to really go and be adventurous you might want to try AWS-Strands-Agents before committing to LangGraph as it may surprise you.

The future of agent frameworks is heading towards greater interoperability through open protocols, enhanced observability, and stronger safety guardrails. While each framework has its unique strengths, the vibrant, open-source nature of the ecosystem ensures that choosing any of these tools today means plugging into a field that is rapidly advancing.

Just like an engineering framework of the past, as to which is right for you, it always depends on you and your team’s skill level, preferred tech stack, and use cases. Being aware of what’s out there is the first step in the right direction!

If you have found this newsletter helpful, and want to support me 🙏:

Checkout my bestselling courses on AWS, System Design, Kubernetes, DevOps, and more: Max discounted links​

AWS SA Bootcamp with Live Classes, Mock Interviews, Hands-On, Resume Improvement and more: https://www.sabootcamp.com/​

Keep learning and keep rocking 🚀,

Raj